As a reader of my local paper, all I ask of folks writing letters to the editor is to fact check what they’re writing, I don’t think that’s too much to ask.
Well, apparantly, one writer to the paper thinks it is.
They start off by railing against a statement I made during the Budget Committee’s vote on the Town Budget pointing out the fact not one resident attending the Budget Committee’s Public Hearing held on January 14, 2015 stood up to suggest the Budget Committee lower either the School or Town moneyed warrant articles, not one. As a matter of fact, most rose to ask the Budget Committee (BC) maintain funding for specific programs such as milfoil erradication and the Introductary Transportaion Program. The writer continued on to state what their idea of what the charge of a Budget Committee member is (some may differ in that view ) and ended by name-calling one member in particular (apparently, I’m ignorant), and encouraging folks to attend the next public hearing (there isn’t one), and suggested folks attend the next meeting (which is the School Deliberative Session) in droves (I would like that) to advise me loud and clear how they feel (again, I would love to hear from the public about a range of issue pertaining to my membership on the BC). But, before they do I would list the following points:
First, the meeting set for January 31st is the School Deliberative Session that has one article on it, the School Budget (which was +$48,030 from the default budget) and voted on unanimously by the BC 12-0-0. Motion by Pam Manney to accept, seconded by Guy Caron. Motion passed.
Second, the purpose of the Public Hearing is to accept input from the public. That there is a strict legal process to said public hearings listed in NH RSA’s in particular RSA32:15, 16 & 17. Part of that law is that we post Legal Notices of Public Hearings via the local newspaper. The fact is, we want to hear from you. You, the public, are an important component of the process. We hear and listen to those that attend. It makes a difference and we, the members of the BC, take what you say seriously and use your statements as a basis to reopen the budget for further discussion. The fact that ones chooses not to engage is not our fault and actually hinders our ability to represent you and your wishes. So, attending does matter.
Third, that the Goffstown Budget committee is governed by strict laws found in RSA32, the Municipal Budget Law, which outlines the duties of a municipal budget committee.
Fifth, that the town of Goffstown has a website which posts notices of meetings and has a calendar that informs the public of important dates and provides information on items of public interest. For example: 2015 Election Information, a webpage that includes a link to the 2015 Town Warrant and other information a voter can go to to acquire information.
In the end, the fact a person doesn’t avail themselves of the opportunities to be informed, included and engaged in forming public policy is not the fault of the governing body and no amount of name-calling and bashing the ones that did engage will change the fact you didn’t.
Update: Not only didn’t people show up in droves to today’s session, they barely showed up at all, in particular, the letter writer, themself.